![]() With The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Kuhn challenged long-standing linear notions of scientific progress, arguing that transformative ideas don’t arise from the day-to-day, gradual process of experimentation and data accumulation but that the revolutions in science, those breakthrough moments that disrupt accepted thinking and offer unanticipated ideas, occur outside of “normal science,” as he called it. Fifty years later, it still has many lessons to teach. When it was first published in 1962, it was a landmark event in the history and philosophy of science. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions is that kind of book. You can read this before The Structure of Scientific Revolutions PDF EPUB full Download at the bottom.Ī good book may have the power to change the way we see the world, but a great book actually becomes part of our daily consciousness, pervading our thinking to the point that we take it for granted, and we forget how provocative and challenging its ideas once were-and still are. Here is a quick description and cover image of book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions written by Thomas S. Brief Summary of Book: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas S. Download The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas S. ![]() Second, it is also the Kuhnian backdrop to this work that blends well into this fashion of exchange among the members of the scientific and philosophical community and their interested general public.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Download by Thomas S. The motivation to proceed in this fashion is two folds: First, I believe on a meta level physicists argue for their case – free from formal constrainsts – using popular books to win not only the support of the general public, but also to use them as an informal means of exchange of relevant philosophical content and consequences of their work with their peers. In this context, I shall use popular texts written by contemporary physicists on the subject. In the second part, I shall apply my findings in the first part and apply it to string theory and its development to determine if string theory satisfies the conditions of a paradigm shift or a revolution. The first part will consist of surveying the literature by Kuhn, and on Kuhn and his critics in search of support for the distinction outlined above. Nevertheless, the idea of a paradigm shift or revolutionary change is still very useful in conceptualizing scientific change and progress in science. For the later Kuhn, it is the “speciated“ research community with a distinct incommensurable lexicon and taxonomic structure that becomes the epitome of the paradigm. “Paradigm shifts represent a genus, and scientific revolutions are species within that genus and whereas all K-revolutions are paradigm shifts, the converse does not hold.” Later Kuhn‘s thoughts on paradigms and revolutions, however, are somewhat different. ![]() Tang I shall argue that the unit of scientific development is paradigm shift and not Kuhnian revolutions. I shall argue that the latest major theoretical construct in physics, the string theory, which has resulted in a powerful theoretico-logico-mathematical construct on the one hand, and theoretical constraints of empirical inaccessibility, predictive incapacity, as well as implicit underdetermination on the other, might quality as a paradigm shift in the spirit of the early Kuhn‘s thoughts on paradigms. We will present four different explanatory concepts of revolutions – Kuhn's, Thagard's, Chen's and Barker's, and Laudan's – and point to the ways in which each of them can be further specified in view of our concept. On the other hand, our concept can serve as the basis on which these conceptions can be further specified. On the one hand, our concept can be used to test the preciseness and accuracy of the these conceptions, by examining to what extent their criteria fit revolutions as they are defined by our concept. The aim of this paper is to offer such a concept, and to show that it can be fruitfully used for a further elaboration of the explanatory conceptions of revolutions. In this paper we show that such “explanatory concepts” of revolutions should be distinguished from a concept based on the identification criteria of scientific revolutions. Conceptualizing scientific revolutions by means of explicating their causes, their underlying structure and implications has been an important part of Kuhn's philosophy of science and belongs to its legacy. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |